Skip to content
Live,

Risk of ruin calculator

If I keep trading this exact edge, what is the chance the drawdown limit ever gets me?

Result

Chance of ever hitting the limit

0.7%

Full-risk losses the room holds
10.0 losses
Expectancy per trade
+0.38 R
The same edge at half the risk
under 0.1%

Exact for the model: the same win rate and reward to risk on every trade, the same dollar risk, independent trades, and as many trades as it takes.

Not investment advice

How far the account can fall before the limit, as a share of it.

How it's worked out

Ruin = r to the power of (room ÷ risk per trade), where p × r^(R + 1) − r + (1 − p) = 0

How it works

Each trade either wins your reward to risk or loses one R, at your win rate. The calculator solves the gambler's ruin equation for that walk exactly, then raises the answer to the number of full-risk losses your drawdown room holds: 10% of room at 1% risk is ten losses. The result is the chance of ever using up the room if you keep trading the same numbers, not the chance within a set number of trades.

The model assumes the same dollar risk on every trade and independent trades. Without a positive expectancy the answer is always 100%, because a walk with no upward drift reaches every depth in the end.

Questions

How is this different from pass probability?

Pass probability simulates one challenge against a target and a clock. Risk of ruin ignores the target and asks the longer question: trading this edge for good, does the drawdown limit ever get hit?

Why does halving my risk help so much?

Halving the risk per trade doubles the losses the same room survives, which squares the probability of ruin: 20% at 1% risk becomes 4% at 0.5%. No other input moves it as hard.

My expectancy is positive. Why is my ruin not zero?

A positive edge makes ruin unlikely, not impossible. Losing runs long enough to use up the room still happen at their natural rate, and that rate is what the calculator prices. The way to push it towards zero is more room per loss: a smaller size.